Responsible Genetics: Examining Responsibility in Light of Genetic Biotechnologies
Galbraith, Kyle Lee
:
2010-04-17
Abstract
This project examines the concept of responsibility in relation to genetics and emerging genetic biotechnologies, with specific reference to preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) and predictive genetic testing. I contend that theories of responsibility operative in bioethics, philosophy, and religious ethics presuppose decision-making contexts and voluntaristic accounts of moral agency. Sparked by insights from the transcripts of religious and medical professional focus groups, I endorse a supplementary account of responsibility bolstered by notions of status and integrity. This account of responsibility, I maintain, reflects how moral agents sometimes speak about responsibility in the clinical context and is more attentive to the challenges posed by emerging genetic technologies.
Drawing on the works of Judith Butler, John Silber, and William Schweiker, I propose an account of responsibility that emphasizes two salient features that are often ignored in scholarly discussions of that concept: 1) Responsibility entails the acceptance of obligations borne from one’s status, regardless of one’s acceptance of the status itself; and 2) while responsibility promotes the movement toward greater integrity in one’s life, that movement paradoxically involves recognizing and incorporating uncertainty and loss of control into that life.
Chapter 1 examines popular discourse on genetics and genetic biotechnologies, with particular reference to the themes of genetic exceptionalism, determinism, and novelty. It also describes what PGD and predictive genetic testing entail. In Chapter 2, I analyze transcripts of focus groups consisting of medical professionals (physicians, nurses, genetic counselors) and religious professionals (evangelical Christian ministers, “mainline” Protestant ministers, hospital chaplains) as well as organizational and denominational statements in order to highlight how responsibility is articulated in relation to genetics-based issues. In Chapter 3, I examine prevalent understandings of responsibility in religious, philosophical, and bioethics literature. In Chapter 4, I turn to Butler, Silber, and Schweiker in order to develop the account of responsibility mentioned above. Finally, in Chapter 5 I reexamine the ethical challenges of PGD and predictive genetic testing in light of the account of responsibility I endorse. I also demonstrate its critical relevance for evidence-based medicine and bioethics.
Files in this item
This item appears in the following collection(s):
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Thornton-Wells, Tricia Ann (2006-11-01)Department: NeuroscienceCommon diseases with a genetic basis are likely to have a very complex etiology, in which the mapping between genotype and phenotype is far from straightforward. A new comprehensive statistical and computational strategy ...
-
Bush, William Scott (2009-03-12)Department: Human GeneticsEvaluating epistasis in whole-genome association studies is an important challenge in human genetics, as many common diseases are thought to have complex underlying genetic architectures that include small independent ...
-
Ellis, Jennifer Rhea (2008-10-22)Department: Biological SciencesOne of the greatest factors contributing to the worldwide decline in biodiversity is habitat destruction leading to the loss and fragmentation of populations of many species. Knowledge of the genetic and demographic factors ...