• About
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   Institutional Repository Home
    • Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    • Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   Institutional Repository Home
    • Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    • Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of Institutional RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDepartmentThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDepartment

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Gavels Defying Guns: The Judicial Control of State Power in Authoritarian Systems

    Manacsa, Rodelio
    : https://etd.library.vanderbilt.edu/etd-12072007-145535
    http://hdl.handle.net/1803/15198
    : 2012-07-10

    Abstract

    GAVELS DEFYING GUNS: THE JUDICIAL CONTROL OF STATE POWER IN AUTHORITARIAN SYSTEMS By Rodelio Dela Cruz Manacsa ABSTRACT When do judges rein in those who reign? In a democracy, the judiciary has the crucial task of protecting fundamental freedoms from the vagaries of the reigning majority. The courts are expected to subject power to rules (Fuller 1964; Shapiro 1981). However, rulers can employ a variety of weaponry to bend the gavel to their will: They can refuse to implement judicial rulings, cut the court’s jurisdiction, reduce the budget allotted to the court, and impeach the magistrates. These threats are particularly compelling in authoritarian systems where judges do not enjoy the institutional safeguards or the popular support that protect their counterparts in more developed polities. Thus, it becomes most relevant to ask: When do judges invalidate actions of government? Why do gavels defy the gun? I develop a theoretical framework that includes a set of contextual, attitudinal, and legal variables to account for when and why judges are emboldened to limit the exercise of governmental power under conditions of concentrated power. Focusing on the high courts of the Philippines and South Africa, the dissertation identifies the conditions that enable judges to overturn state action at the risk of incurring the wrath of the sword.
    Show full item record

    Files in this item

    Icon
    Name:
    DISSERTMANACSAPART2.pdf
    Size:
    964.5Kb
    Format:
    PDF
    View/Open
    Icon
    Name:
    DISSERTMANACSAPART1.pdf
    Size:
    22.50Kb
    Format:
    PDF
    View/Open

    This item appears in the following collection(s):

    • Electronic Theses and Dissertations

    Connect with Vanderbilt Libraries

    Your Vanderbilt

    • Alumni
    • Current Students
    • Faculty & Staff
    • International Students
    • Media
    • Parents & Family
    • Prospective Students
    • Researchers
    • Sports Fans
    • Visitors & Neighbors

    Support the Jean and Alexander Heard Libraries

    Support the Library...Give Now

    Gifts to the Libraries support the learning and research needs of the entire Vanderbilt community. Learn more about giving to the Libraries.

    Become a Friend of the Libraries

    Quick Links

    • Hours
    • About
    • Employment
    • Staff Directory
    • Accessibility Services
    • Contact
    • Vanderbilt Home
    • Privacy Policy