• About
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   Institutional Repository Home
    • Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    • Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   Institutional Repository Home
    • Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    • Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of Institutional RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Uncertainty quantification in time-dependent reliability analysis

    Ling, You
    : https://etd.library.vanderbilt.edu/etd-08252013-231229
    http://hdl.handle.net/1803/14008
    : 2013-09-19

    Abstract

    The prediction of failure probability for engineering components/devices under service conditions often involves the use of predictive models and measurement data. The fact that no model is absolutely correct indicates the existence of "model uncertainty", while the available of a limited amount of data or imprecise measurements introduces an additional source of uncertainty called "data uncertainty". These two sources of uncertainty can be classified as epistemic uncertainty (uncertainty due to lack of knowledge/information). Another important source of uncertainty comes from natural variability of physical quantities. In time-dependent problems, uncertainty due to all these sources can accumulate with time, and thus can significantly affect the reliability prediction. Hence, rigorous quantification of model uncertainty, data uncertainty, and natural variability needs to be included in the reliability analysis. This research focuses on two activities to address model uncertainty: (1) model calibration, and (2) model validation. Model calibration aims to quantify the uncertainty in the estimation of model parameters based on the available information on model input and output variables. Bayesian calibration under the well known Kennedy and O'Hagan (KOH) framework is investigated and extended for multi-physics systems with various possible types of available information. Model validation is the procedure of assessing the predictability of models in the domain of intended use. Probabilistic model validation methods are developed in order to quantify the confidence in model prediction, with the capability to include fully, partially, and un-characterized validation data. A Bayesian network-based probabilistic uncertainty quantification (UQ) framework is then developed to include the results of model calibration and validation in time-dependent reliability analysis of engineering systems, including: (1) time-dependent reliability prediction for a multi-physics MEMS device, and (2) prognosis of mechanical components in service with the inclusion of monitoring data (loading history and system health).
    Show full item record

    Files in this item

    Icon
    Name:
    Dissertation_Ling_2013.pdf
    Size:
    2.937Mb
    Format:
    PDF
    View/Open

    This item appears in the following collection(s):

    • Electronic Theses and Dissertations

    Connect with Vanderbilt Libraries

    Your Vanderbilt

    • Alumni
    • Current Students
    • Faculty & Staff
    • International Students
    • Media
    • Parents & Family
    • Prospective Students
    • Researchers
    • Sports Fans
    • Visitors & Neighbors

    Support the Jean and Alexander Heard Libraries

    Support the Library...Give Now

    Gifts to the Libraries support the learning and research needs of the entire Vanderbilt community. Learn more about giving to the Libraries.

    Become a Friend of the Libraries

    Quick Links

    • Hours
    • About
    • Employment
    • Staff Directory
    • Accessibility Services
    • Contact
    • Vanderbilt Home
    • Privacy Policy