• About
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   Institutional Repository Home
    • Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    • Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   Institutional Repository Home
    • Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    • Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of Institutional RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Measurement of Semantic Knowledge and Its Contribution to Object Recognition Performance

    Van Gulick, Ana Elizabeth
    : https://etd.library.vanderbilt.edu/etd-05222014-170633
    http://hdl.handle.net/1803/12361
    : 2014-06-06

    Abstract

    How do people differ in their ability to recognize objects, and where do these differences come from? How much of the differences between people in a given domain stem from domain-general abilities, and how much from domain-specific experience? The goals of this thesis are to create measures of non-perceptual semantic knowledge acquired with experience in a domain, and to explore how such knowledge can help us understand individual differences in high-level cognition. We created the Semantic Vanderbilt Expertise Test (SVET), which focuses on one important aspect of semantic knowledge that can be measured across categories: acquisition of relevant nomenclature. We implemented SVETs for eight categories: cars, planes, Transformers, dinosaurs, shoes, birds, leaves, and mushrooms. In Study 1, the SVET was tested and refined with an online sample. The SVET showed good reliability and coverage of the full range of performance. In Study 2A, the SVET was tested with the VET (Vanderbilt Expertise Test, a measure of visual memory) for all categories, measures of domain-general visual and verbal abilities (Gf), and self-reports of category experience in a university sample. The SVET showed good validity as it was more correlated with experience and VET performance for the same category than with the average of other categories. We tested the hypothesis that the only source of domain-specific shared variance between the VET and SVET is experience with a category. This hypothesis was partly supported for six of the eight categories tested. In Study 3, we explore lateralization of visual object recognition performance as a function of semantic knowledge. Overall, this work contributes to the new research area of individual differences in object recognition and provides a carefully tested and refined tool, the SVET, to the psychology community for future use in this field.
    Show full item record

    Files in this item

    Icon
    Name:
    VanGulick.pdf
    Size:
    5.293Mb
    Format:
    PDF
    View/Open

    This item appears in the following collection(s):

    • Electronic Theses and Dissertations

    Connect with Vanderbilt Libraries

    Your Vanderbilt

    • Alumni
    • Current Students
    • Faculty & Staff
    • International Students
    • Media
    • Parents & Family
    • Prospective Students
    • Researchers
    • Sports Fans
    • Visitors & Neighbors

    Support the Jean and Alexander Heard Libraries

    Support the Library...Give Now

    Gifts to the Libraries support the learning and research needs of the entire Vanderbilt community. Learn more about giving to the Libraries.

    Become a Friend of the Libraries

    Quick Links

    • Hours
    • About
    • Employment
    • Staff Directory
    • Accessibility Services
    • Contact
    • Vanderbilt Home
    • Privacy Policy