Show simple item record

An Evaluation of Longitudinal Measures of Anticholinergic Exposure for Application in Retrospective Administrative Data Analyses

dc.contributor.authorDmochowski, Roger
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-27T19:42:51Z
dc.date.available2020-08-27T19:42:51Z
dc.date.issued2019-09
dc.identifier.citationLozano-Ortega, G., Szabo, S.M., Cheung, A. et al. An Evaluation of Longitudinal Measures of Anticholinergic Exposure for Application in Retrospective Administrative Data Analyses. Adv Ther 36, 2247–2259 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-019-01035-zen_US
dc.identifier.issn0741-238X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1803/15577
dc.descriptionOnly Vanderbilt University affiliated authors are listed on VUIR. For a full list of authors, access the version of record at https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12325-019-01035-z#rightslinken_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction As continuous exposure to anticholinergics has been associated with adverse outcomes, accurately measuring exposure is important. However, no gold standard measure is available, and the performance of existing measures has not been compared. Our objective was to compare the properties of the Cumulative Anticholinergic Burden (CAB) measure against two existing measures of anticholinergic exposure and to assess their compatibility for use in observational studies based on claims data. Methods The average daily dose, cumulative dose and CAB measures were evaluated on: the applicability for use with anticholinergic burden scales, the ability to consider duration and/or accumulation of exposure, and consideration of anticholinergic dose, potency, and residual effect. To calculate each measure empirically, Truven MarketScan claims data from 2012 to 2015 were analyzed. Cumulative anticholinergic exposure over 1-year post-enrollment was calculated for each measure using Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden scale scores. Median [interquartile range (IQR)] and ranges of measure scores, and Spearman's correlation coefficients between measures, were estimated. Due to the differing methods of calculation, the absolute values of each score cannot be compared. Results The properties of the different measures varied, with only the CAB considering both dose and theoretical potency. The cohort included 99,742 individuals (mean age = 73.1 years; 54.9% female). Among individuals prescribed anticholinergics (n = 55,969), 1-year median (IQR) scores based on average daily dose, cumulative dose and CAB measures were 0.9 (0.3-1.5), 16.9 (7.3-33.9) and 203 (68-500), respectively. Measures were highly inter-correlated (r(2) = 0.74-0.83). Conclusions Considering both potency and dose, the CAB may prove a more comprehensive measure of anticholinergic burden; however, additional research is necessary to demonstrate whether it has any association with relevant health-related outcomes. Funding Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe study was initiated and funded by Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc. Astellas Pharma Global Development Inc. also funded the journal's article processing charges and Open Access fee. All authors had full access to all of the data in this study and take complete responsibility for the integrity of the data and accuracy of the data analysis.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherAdvances in Therapyen_US
dc.rightsThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
dc.rights
dc.source.urihttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12325-019-01035-z#rightslink
dc.subjectAnticholinergicen_US
dc.subjectBurdenen_US
dc.subjectClaims analysisen_US
dc.titleAn Evaluation of Longitudinal Measures of Anticholinergic Exposure for Application in Retrospective Administrative Data Analysesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s12325-019-01035-z


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record