Show simple item record

Engaging policy in science writing: Patterns and strategies

dc.contributor.authorRuhl, J. B.
dc.contributor.authorPosner, Stephen M.
dc.contributor.authorRicketts, Taylor H.
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-27T18:05:45Z
dc.date.available2020-08-27T18:05:45Z
dc.date.issued2019-08-01
dc.identifier.citationEngaging policy in science writing: Patterns and strategiesen_US
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1803/15573
dc.description.abstractMany scientific researchers aspire to engage policy in their writing, but translating scientific research and findings into policy discussion often requires an understanding of the institutional complexities of legal and policy processes and actors. To examine how researchers have undertaken that challenge, we developed a set of metrics and applied them to articles published in one of the principal academic publication venues for science and policy-Science magazine's Policy Forum. We reviewed each Policy Forum article published over a five-year period (2011-15), 220 in all. For each article, we assessed the level of policy content based on presence of a stated policy proposal or position and identification of the relevant policy actors and actions, and recorded attributes such as field of science, field of policy, number of references to legal and policy sources, number of authors from law and policy institutions, and number of citations. We find that a handful of science fields dominate publication frequency, but that all fields have produced publications with high policy engagement. Of the attributes, number of references to law and policy sources is correlated positively with level of engagement, whereas number of law and policy authors was fairly constant across all depths of engagement. Surprisingly, level of policy engagement was negatively correlated with the number of citations an article subsequently received. We offer possible explanations for these results and thoughts for authors, editors, and research institutions interested in facilitating robust engagement of policy in scientific writing.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherPLoS Oneen_US
dc.rights© 2019 Ruhl et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
dc.source.urihttps://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0220497
dc.titleEngaging policy in science writing: Patterns and strategiesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0220497


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record