Show simple item record

Improving social validity of behavioral interventions implemented with young children

dc.contributor.advisorLedford, Jennifer R
dc.creatorChazin, Kate Tygielski
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-06T21:26:42Z
dc.date.available2023-01-06T21:26:42Z
dc.date.created2022-12
dc.date.issued2022-11-21
dc.date.submittedDecember 2022
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1803/17887
dc.description.abstractOver recent years, the field of applied behavior analysis (ABA) has trended toward increased focus on improving the ethics and social validity of behavior analytic interventions. As part of this shift, ABA researchers and practitioners have begun to call long-held practices into question and seek alternative options. Despite their evidence base, some ABA practices may involve goals or procedures considered unacceptable to direct consumers, particularly those who directly receive intervention. The purpose of these two studies was to identify, implement, and assess more socially valid practices for use with children—particularly young autistic children, who are the most common recipients of ABA services. In the first study, we conducted a survey of 660 autistic adults, parents of young autistic children, and practitioners who serve young autistic children. We gathered quantitative and qualitative data to assess the social acceptability of goals, learning contexts, and behavioral intervention procedures typically implemented with young autistic children. Results indicated that understanding the perspectives of autistic adults and other stakeholders can inform educational practices, to make them more autistic-affirming and socially valid. In the second study, we adapted two established behavioral interventions (functional communication training [FCT] and schedule thinning) to be less restrictive and more socially valid. We assessed the efficacy of these adapted interventions with three preschool-aged participants, two of whom were autistic, in the context of single case research designs. Adapted FCT resulted in increased communication and decreased challenging behavior across participants, adapted schedule thinning resulted in increased delay tolerance for two of three participants, and social validity measures were inconclusive. These results indicated that established behavioral interventions can be adapted to improve social validity, and still achieve meaningful outcomes for some learners.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.subjectautistic perspectives
dc.subjectchallenging behavior
dc.subjectextinction alternatives
dc.subjectsocial validity
dc.subjectsocial acceptability
dc.subjectleast restrictive interventions
dc.titleImproving social validity of behavioral interventions implemented with young children
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.updated2023-01-06T21:26:43Z
dc.contributor.committeeMemberStaubitz, Johanna L
dc.type.materialtext
thesis.degree.namePhD
thesis.degree.levelDoctoral
thesis.degree.disciplineSpecial Education
thesis.degree.grantorVanderbilt University Graduate School
dc.creator.orcid0000-0001-8619-7702
dc.contributor.committeeChairLedford, Jennifer R


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record