Show simple item record

Single-event charge collection and upset in 65-nm and 40-nm dual- and triple-well bulk CMOS SRAMS

dc.creatorChatterjee, Indranil
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-21T21:33:49Z
dc.date.available2012-04-05
dc.date.issued2012-04-05
dc.identifier.urihttps://etd.library.vanderbilt.edu/etd-03252012-195135
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1803/11296
dc.description.abstractCMOS technologies can be either dual-well or triple-well. Triple-well technology has several advantages compared to dual-well technology in terms of electrical performance. Differences in the ion-induced single-event response between these two technology options, however, are not well understood. This work presents a comparative analysis of heavy ion-induced upsets in dual-well and triple-well 40-nm CMOS SRAMs. Primary factors affecting the charge-collection mechanisms for a wide range of particle energies are investigated, showing that triple-well technologies are more vulnerable to low-LET particles, while dual-well technologies are more vulnerable to high-LET particles. For the triple-well technology, charge confinement and multiple-transistor charge collection triggers the “Single Event Upset Reversal” mechanism that reduces sensitivity at high LETs.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.subjectSoft-errors
dc.subjectSingle-Event Upset Reversal
dc.subjectHeavy Ion Irradiation
dc.subjectTriple-well
dc.subjectDual-well
dc.subjectSingle-Event Effects
dc.titleSingle-event charge collection and upset in 65-nm and 40-nm dual- and triple-well bulk CMOS SRAMS
dc.typethesis
dc.contributor.committeeMemberRonald D. Schrimpf
dc.type.materialtext
thesis.degree.nameMS
thesis.degree.levelthesis
thesis.degree.disciplineElectrical Engineering
thesis.degree.grantorVanderbilt University
local.embargo.terms2012-04-05
local.embargo.lift2012-04-05
dc.contributor.committeeChairBharat L. Bhuva


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record