• About
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   Institutional Repository Home
    • College of Arts and Science
    • Physics and Astronomy Department
    • Physics & Astronomy Publications
    • View Item
    •   Institutional Repository Home
    • College of Arts and Science
    • Physics and Astronomy Department
    • Physics & Astronomy Publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of Institutional RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDepartmentThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDepartment

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Likelihood non-Gaussianity in Large-scale Structure Analyses

    Hahn, ChangHoon
    Beutler, Florian
    Sinha, Manodeep
    Berlind, Andreas
    Ho, Shirley
    Hogg, David W.
    : http://hdl.handle.net/1803/9530
    : 2019-02-26

    Abstract

    Standard present-day large-scale structure (LSS) analyses make a major assumption in their Bayesian parameter inference – that the likelihood has a Gaussian form. For summary statistics currently used in LSS, this assumption, even if the underlying density field is Gaussian, cannot be correct in detail. We investigate the impact of this assumption on two recent LSS analyses: the Beutler et al. power spectrum multipole (Pℓ) analysis and the Sinha et al. group multiplicity function (ζ) analysis. Using non-parametric divergence estimators on mock catalogues originally constructed for covariance matrix estimation, we identify significant non-Gaussianity in both the Pℓ and ζ likelihoods. We then use Gaussian mixture density estimation and independent component analysis on the same mocks to construct likelihood estimates that approximate the true likelihood better than the Gaussian pseudo-likelihood. Using these likelihood estimates, we accurately estimate the true posterior probability distribution of the Beutler et al. and Sinha et al. parameters. Likelihood non-Gaussianity shifts the fσ8 constraint by −0.44σ, but otherwise does not significantly impact the overall parameter constraints of Beutler et al. For the ζ analysis, using the pseudo-likelihood significantly underestimates the uncertainties and biases the constraints of the Sinha et al. halo occupation parameters. For logM1 and α, the posteriors are shifted by +0.43σ and −0.51σ and broadened by 42 per cent and 66 per cent⁠, respectively. The divergence and likelihood estimation methods we present provide a straightforward framework for quantifying the impact of likelihood non-Gaussianity and deriving more accurate parameter constraints.
    Show full item record

    Files in this item

    Thumbnail
    Name:
    Likelihood of non-Gaussianity ...
    Size:
    959.6Kb
    Format:
    PDF
    View/Open

    This item appears in the following collection(s):

    • Physics & Astronomy Publications

    Connect with Vanderbilt Libraries

    Your Vanderbilt

    • Alumni
    • Current Students
    • Faculty & Staff
    • International Students
    • Media
    • Parents & Family
    • Prospective Students
    • Researchers
    • Sports Fans
    • Visitors & Neighbors

    Support the Jean and Alexander Heard Libraries

    Support the Library...Give Now

    Gifts to the Libraries support the learning and research needs of the entire Vanderbilt community. Learn more about giving to the Libraries.

    Become a Friend of the Libraries

    Quick Links

    • Hours
    • About
    • Employment
    • Staff Directory
    • Accessibility Services
    • Contact
    • Vanderbilt Home
    • Privacy Policy