Show simple item record

Against Immutability

dc.contributor.authorClarke, Jessica A.
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-05T22:33:56Z
dc.date.available2018-11-05T22:33:56Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citation125 Yale Law Journal 2 (2015)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1803/9322
dc.descriptionarticle published in a law journalen_US
dc.description.abstractCourts often hold that antidiscrimination law protects “immutable” characteristics, like sex and race. In a series of recent cases, gay rights advocates have persuaded courts to expand the concept of immutability to include not just those traits an individual cannot change, but also those considered too important for anyone to be asked to change. Sexual orientation and religion are paradigmatic examples. This Article critically examines this new concept of immutability, asking whether it is fundamentally different from the old one and how it might apply to characteristics on the borders of employment discrimination law’s protection, such as obesity, pregnancy, and criminal records. It argues that the new immutability does not avoid the old version’s troublesome judgments about which traits are morally blameworthy and introduces new difficulties by requiring problematic judgments about which traits are important. Ultimately, immutability considerations of both the old and new varieties distract from the aim of employment discrimination law: targeting unreasonable and systemic forms of bias.en_US
dc.format.extent1 PDF (103 pages)en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherYale Law Journalen_US
dc.subjectemployment discrimination, criminal records and employment, immutabilityen_US
dc.subject.lcshlawen_US
dc.subject.lcshlabor and employment lawen_US
dc.titleAgainst Immutabilityen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.ssrn-urihttps://ssrn.com/abstract=2569843


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record