Show simple item record

Uninformative Patents

dc.contributor.authorSeymore, Sean B.
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-06T15:19:07Z
dc.date.available2018-07-06T15:19:07Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citation55 Houston Law Review 377 (2017)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1803/9208
dc.descriptionarticle published in a law reviewen_US
dc.description.abstractIt is a bedrock principle of patent law that an inventor need not know or understand how or why an invention works. The patent statute simply requires that the inventor explain how to make and use the invention. But explaining how to make and use something without understanding how or why it works yields patents with uninformative disclosures. Their teaching function is limited; someone who wants to understand or figure out the underlying scientific principles must turn elsewhere. This limited disclosure rule does not align with the norms of science and tends to make patent documents a less robust form of technical literature. This Essay explores the contours of the rule, the policy tradeoffs, and the broader implications for the patent system.en_US
dc.format.extent1 PDF (26 pages)en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherHouston Law Reviewen_US
dc.subject.lcshLawen_US
dc.subject.lcshPatent lawen_US
dc.titleUninformative Patentsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.ssrn-urihttps://ssrn.com/abstract=3122713


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record