Show simple item record

The Interpretive Dimension of Seminole Rock

dc.contributor.authorStack, Kevin M.
dc.identifier.citation22 George Mason Law Review 669 (2015)en_US
dc.descriptionarticle published in law reviewen_US
dc.description.abstractA lively debate has emerged over the deferential standard of review courts apply when reviewing an agency’s interpretation of its own regulations. That standard, traditionally associated with Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co. and now more frequently attributed to Auer v. Robbins, states that a court must accept an agency’s interpretation of its own regulations unless the interpretation is "plainly erroneous or inconsistent with the regulation." This Article argues that a court’s choice of method for interpreting regulations — including how it determines which agency interpretations are inconsistent with the regulation — may be just as important, if not more important, to the outcome of review as the standard of review the court applies. The point that the outcome of review is a function not only of the standard but also of the interpretive method is long-acknowledged in the debate over Chevron. It applies to review of the interpretation of regulations as well. If the ultimate framework of review is a problem with two important dimensions — the standard of review and the interpretive method — then there is reason to evaluate the likely effects of different methods of regulatory interpretation. The Article then argues that a purposivist approach, one which requires readings of regulations to be consistent with those in the regulation’s preamble, identifies a narrower range of acceptable readings and offers greater notice of the regulation’s meaning than relying on the regulation’s text alone. As a result, this regulatory purposivist method holds promise for addressing many of the concerns motivating challenges to the Seminole Rock/Auer standard whether or not that standard is retained.en_US
dc.format.extent1 PDF (26 pages)en_US
dc.publisherGeorge Mason Law Reviewen_US
dc.subjectRegulatory interpretationen_US
dc.subjectJudicial reviewen_US
dc.subjectLaw -- United States -- Interpretation and construction.en_US
dc.subject.lcshLaw -- Interpretation and constructionen_US
dc.titleThe Interpretive Dimension of Seminole Rocken_US

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record