Show simple item record

Community Control Over Camera Surveillance: A Response to Bennett Capers's "Crime, Surveillance, and Communities"

dc.contributor.authorSlobogin, Christopher, 1951-
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-17T19:44:32Z
dc.date.available2014-07-17T19:44:32Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citation40 Fordham Urb. L.J. 993 (2013)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1803/6589
dc.descriptionarticle published in law journalen_US
dc.description.abstractProfessor Capers's article helps stimulate thinking about the way in which community views and individual rights interact. In my view, where police propose to conduct surveillance of groups, as occurs with camera surveillance (including the newly developing drone camera systems)', the affected group should be heavily involved in the authorization process. If the surveillance is authorized, care must be taken to ensure that all members of the group are equally affected by it unless and until individualized suspicion, proportionate to the intrusion, develops. That formula ensures that the interests of both the collective and the individual are protected.en_US
dc.format.extent1 PDF (7 pages)en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherFordham Urban Law Journalen_US
dc.subject.lcshVideo surveillance -- United Statesen_US
dc.subject.lcshVideo surveillance -- Social aspectsen_US
dc.titleCommunity Control Over Camera Surveillance: A Response to Bennett Capers's "Crime, Surveillance, and Communities"en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record