Show simple item record

Lessons from the Procedural Politics of the "Comprehensive" National Energy Policy Act of 1992

dc.contributor.authorRossi, Jim, 1965-
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-17T16:11:43Z
dc.date.available2014-07-17T16:11:43Z
dc.date.issued1995
dc.identifier.citation19 Harv. Envtl. L. Rev. 195 (1995)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1803/6586
dc.descriptionarticle published in law reviewen_US
dc.description.abstractThis Article examines the political and procedural history of the EPAct in order to arrive at some general lessons and recommendations regarding congressional formation of energy policy. At least two commentators on the EPAct praise it as the "second generation" of federal energy policy, based in laws that achieve "their mandates more by consensus than coercion." The EPAct's history, however, was far from smooth. Procedural obstacles, such as filibuster, inter-committee conflict, and inter-chamber conflict, led many to declare the EPAct dead on several occasions prior to its passage.en_US
dc.format.extent1 PDF (47 pages)en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherHarvard Environmental Law Reviewen_US
dc.subject.lcshUnited States. Energy Policy Act of 1992en_US
dc.titleLessons from the Procedural Politics of the "Comprehensive" National Energy Policy Act of 1992en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record