Show simple item record

Putting the Law Back in Constitutional Law

dc.contributor.authorSherry, Suzanna
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-09T18:09:01Z
dc.date.available2014-07-09T18:09:01Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.citation25 Const. Comment. 461 (2009)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1803/6547
dc.descriptionarticle published in law journalen_US
dc.description.abstractTaking a cue from Professor Laurence Tribe's decision to abandon the third edition of his constitutional law treatise, the organizers of this symposium have asked us to address whether constitutional law is in crisis. I am agnostic on that question, although I think that there has been a turn in the wrong direction. But if there is a crisis, I know who to blame. If constitutional law is in crisis, it is our fault. The legal academy has erased the distinction between law and politics, used its expertise for political advantage rather than for elucidation, and mis-educated a generation of lawyers. We thus should not be surprised if judges have, as Professor Ristroph suggests, lost their faith in the Constitution. We have led them into the wilderness.en_US
dc.format.extent1 PDF (7 pages)en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherConstitutional Commentaryen_US
dc.subject.lcshConstitutional law -- United Statesen_US
dc.subject.lcshConstitutional history -- United Statesen_US
dc.subject.lcshLaw schools -- United Statesen_US
dc.titlePutting the Law Back in Constitutional Lawen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record