Show simple item record

Group-Conflict Resolution: Sources of Resistance to Reconciliation

dc.contributor.authorO'Connor, Erin O'Hara, 1965-
dc.identifier.citation72 Law & Contemp. Probs. i (2009)en_US
dc.descriptionarticle published in law journalen_US
dc.description.abstractIn the past few years a number of scholars in a variety of intellectual disciplines have contributed to a better understanding of dyadic conflicts and their resolution. In particular, sociologists, psychologists, anthropologists, lawyers, and others have explored the dynamics of apology and its role in deescalating disputes and promoting forgiveness and reconciliation. Furthermore, we have a better understanding today of the benefits to individuals from forgiveness and reconciliation. Victims who are able to forgive their transgressors have better psychological and physical health and lead richer lives. Because lawyers tend to focus their attentions on legal disputes, a growing body of legal scholarship attempts to apply these insights to help promote apology, forgiveness, and reconciliation in courts and alternative dispute-resolution fora. This scholarship has in turn provoked a debate among legal scholars regarding the proper use of apology and apology-promoting tools in the context of legal disputes.en_US
dc.format.extent1 PDF (21 pages)en_US
dc.publisherLaw and Contemporary Problemsen_US
dc.subject.lcshTherapeutic jurisprudenceen_US
dc.titleGroup-Conflict Resolution: Sources of Resistance to Reconciliationen_US

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record