Show simple item record

The Ninth Amendment: Righting an Unwritten Constitution

dc.contributor.authorSherry, Suzanna
dc.identifier.citation64 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 1001 (1988)en_US
dc.descriptionarticle published in law reviewen_US
dc.description.abstractAs the recent Symposium in these pages indicated, the preliminary debate over the meaning of the ninth amendment is essentially over. Despite the diversity of views expressed in the Symposium, all but one contributor agreed that the ninth amendment does protect judicially enforceable unenumerated rights. The real question now must be how to identify those rights. Only Professor Michael McConnell disputes the conclusion that the ninth amendment allows judges to enforce unenumerated rights. He suggests that neither the history of the Constitution nor sound political theory supports such a reading of the ninth amendment.' Using his article as a focus for this Essay, I would like to do two things: (1) to add to the historical work demonstrating the framers' commitment to judicially enforceable unenumerated rights; (2) to comment generally on the New Right insistence on strict textual limits to judicial activism, which I believe stems from a mistaken view of the judicial process.en_US
dc.format.extent1 PDF (17 pages)en_US
dc.publisherChicago-Kent Law Reviewen_US
dc.subject.lcshUnited States. Constitution. 9th Amendmenten_US
dc.subject.lcshCivil rights -- United Statesen_US
dc.subject.lcshConstitutional law -- United Statesen_US
dc.subject.lcshPolitical questions and judicial power -- United Statesen_US
dc.titleThe Ninth Amendment: Righting an Unwritten Constitutionen_US

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record