Show simple item record

Natural Law in the States

dc.contributor.authorSherry, Suzanna
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-30T13:24:25Z
dc.date.available2014-05-30T13:24:25Z
dc.date.issued1992
dc.identifier.citation61 U. Cin. L. Rev. 171 (1992)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1803/6374
dc.descriptionarticle published in law reviewen_US
dc.description.abstractTwo of our most cherished constitutional myths are that we are, more or less, carrying on the constitutional traditions of the framers, and that the framers' most significant innovation was the invention of a written constitution. Neither belief is true. This article is the second in a series suggesting that our vision of the Constitution differs in a particular and important way from that of the framers: for us, it is the sole source of fundamental law, while for the framers it was only one source among many.en_US
dc.format.extent1 PDF (53 pages)en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherCincinnati Law Reviewen_US
dc.subject.lcshConstitutional history -- United Statesen_US
dc.titleNatural Law in the Statesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record