| dc.contributor.author | Viscusi, W. Kip | |
| dc.contributor.author | Hastie, Reid | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2014-05-16T20:20:49Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2014-05-16T20:20:49Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2002 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 51 DePaul L. Rev. 987 (2002) | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1803/6363 | |
| dc.description | article published in law review | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Richard Lempert, a Professor of Law and Sociology at the University of Michigan criticized our recent article on judge and jury performance of a punitive damage judgment task, calling it a "failure of a social science case for change." Professor Lempert's depiction of our research is confusing and incorrect. However, because we believe a reading of only the Lempert critique can lead to a substantial misunderstanding of our research and its implications, we have written a reply. | en_US |
| dc.format.extent | 1 PDF (11 pages) | en_US |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
| dc.publisher | DePaul Law Review | en_US |
| dc.subject | Lempert, Richard. Juries, hindsight, and punitive damage awards. | en_US |
| dc.subject.lcsh | Jury -- Management -- Untied States | en_US |
| dc.title | Juries, Hindsight, and Punitive Damages Awards: Reply to Richard Lempert | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
