Show simple item record

How Different is Death? Jury Sentencing in Capital and Non-Capital Cases Compared

dc.contributor.authorKing, Nancy J., 1958-
dc.date.accessioned2014-02-01T13:17:02Z
dc.date.available2014-02-01T13:17:02Z
dc.date.issued2004
dc.identifier.citation2 Ohio St. J. Crim. L. 195 (2004)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1803/5899
dc.description.abstractDrawing upon a recent study of felony jury sentencing in Kentucky, Virginia, and Arkansas, this essay highlights some of the similarities and differences between jury sentencing in capital cases and jury sentencing in non-capital cases. Unlike jury sentencing in capital cases, jury sentencing in non-capital cases includes functional differentials in judge and jury options for sentencing, and fewer controls on arbitrary decision-making. Jury sentencing in both contexts shares the potential for reluctance on the part of elected judges to reduce jury sentences, information gaps on the part of jurors in setting sentences, and, above all, service as a tool in negotiating settlements.en_US
dc.format.extent1 PDF (21 pages)en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherOhio State Journal of Criminal Lawen_US
dc.subject.lcshSentences (Criminal procedure) -- United Statesen_US
dc.subject.lcshJury -- United Statesen_US
dc.subject.lcshCapital punishment -- United Statesen_US
dc.titleHow Different is Death? Jury Sentencing in Capital and Non-Capital Cases Compareden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record