Show simple item record

Postconviction Review of Jury Discrimination: Measuring the Effects of Juror Race on Jury Decisions

dc.contributor.authorKing, Nancy J., 1958-
dc.date.accessioned2013-12-31T19:12:23Z
dc.date.available2013-12-31T19:12:23Z
dc.date.issued1993
dc.identifier.citation92 Mich. L. Rev. 63 (1993)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1803/5850
dc.description.abstractAs the Court has expanded its definition of jury selection techniques that violate constitutional standards, it has narrowed the circumstances that entitle defendants to postconviction relief. These two developments are now colliding; the emerging law is uncertain. One trend, however, is plain: divisions over the utility and propriety of applying harmless error, prejudice, and innocence standards to jury discrimination claims are deepening. By carefully evaluating the validity of some these disputes, I hope to have made remedial choices more informed and more attainable.en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherMichigan Law Reviewen_US
dc.subject.lcshJury selectionen_US
dc.subject.lcshJurorsen_US
dc.subject.lcshDiscrimination in justice administrationen_US
dc.subject.lcshPost-conviction remediesen_US
dc.titlePostconviction Review of Jury Discrimination: Measuring the Effects of Juror Race on Jury Decisionsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record