Now showing items 1-15 of 15

    • Maroney, Terry A. (Notre Dame Law Review, 2011)
      In Graham v. Florida, the Supreme Court held that the Eighth Amendment prohibits a sentence of life without possibility of parole for a non-homicide crime committed when the offender was under the age of eighteen. In an ...
    • Maroney, Terry A. (Vanderbilt Law Review, 2012)
      Judges get angry. Law, however, is of two minds as to whether they should; more importantly, it is of two minds as to whether judges’ anger should influence their behavior and decision making. On the one hand, anger is the ...
    • Maroney, Terry A. (Vanderbilt Law Review, 2009)
      In Gonzales v. Carhart the Supreme Court invoked post-abortion regret to justify a ban on a particular abortion procedure. The Court was proudly folk-psychological, representing its observations about women's emotional ...
    • Maroney, Terry A. (American Criminal Law Review, 2006)
      Adjudicative competence, more commonly referred to as competence to stand trial, is a highly under-theorized area of law. Though it is well established that, to be competent, a criminal defendant must have a "rational" as ...
    • Maroney, Terry A. (California Law Review, 2011)
      Judges are human and experience emotion when hearing cases, though the standard account of judging long has denied that fact. In the post-realist era it is possible to acknowledge that judges have emotional reactions to ...
    • Maroney, Terry A. (Court Review, 2013)
      Judges, like all of us, have been acculturated to an ideal of dispassion. But judges experience emotion on a regular basis. Judicial emotion must be managed competently. The psychology of emotion regulation can help judges ...
    • Maroney, Terry A. (Notre Dame Law Review, 2009)
      Recent scientific findings about the developing teen brain have both captured public attention and begun to percolate through legal theory and practice. Indeed, many believe that developmental neuroscience contributed to ...
    • Maroney, Terry A. (Virginia Journal of Social Policy & the Law, 2009)
      In a contribution to this Symposium on Law and Emotion: Re-Envisioning Family Law, Phillip Shaver and his co-authors succinctly encapsulate contemporary psychological theory on interpersonal attachment -- primarily ...
    • Maroney, Terry A. (Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, 2013)
      This article has briefly set forth the fundamental flaws in the ideal of judicial dispassion, made the case that judges are best advised to engage with rather than suppress their emotions, and demonstrated how taking such ...
    • Maroney, Terry A. (Quinnipiac Law Review, 2012)
      Law and emotion scholarship can engage with law on its own terms. It can seek to expose moments where the law already incorporates some kind of emotional component, and it can show how a richer understanding of emotion ...
    • Maroney, Terry A. (California Law Review, 2011)
      In contemporary Western jurisprudence it is never appropriate for emotion - anger, love, hatred, sadness, disgust, fear, joy - to affect judicial decision-making. A good judge should feel no emotion; if she does, she puts ...
    • Maroney, Terry A. (New York University Law Review, 1998)
      The 1980s and 1990s witnessed an extraordinary amount of police, legislative, judicial, scholarly, and community activity around hate crime. Such activity was attributable to a new "anti-hate-crime movement," conditions ...
    • Maroney, Terry A. (Law and Contemporary Problems, 2009)
      In this brief Comment, Maroney offers a perspective based in the scientific study of fear and social-group judgment. She discusses research showing that humans display heightened, persistent fear responses to "outgroup" ...
    • Maroney, Terry A. (Boston College Law Review, 2020)
      Judicial temperament is simultaneously the thing we think all judges must have and the thing that no one can quite put a finger on. Extant accounts are scattered and thin, and either present a laundry list of desirable ...
    • Maroney, Terry A. (Texas Law Review, 2015)
      In "Heart Versus Head," Rachlinski, Guthrie, and Wistrich present experimental findings suggesting that judges sometimes rule on the basis of emotion rather than reason. Though there is much of value in their findings, ...