• About
    • Login
    Search 
    •   Institutional Repository Home
    • Law School
    • Search
    •   Institutional Repository Home
    • Law School
    • Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of Institutional RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDepartmentThis CommunityBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDepartment

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Discover

    AuthorSherry, Suzanna (11)Chen, Jim, 1966- (4)Edelman, Paul H. (4)Slobogin, Christopher, 1951- (4)George, Tracey E., 1967- (2)Swain, Carol M. (Carol Miller) (2)Allensworth, Rebecca Haw (1)Bressman, Lisa Schultz (1)Bressman, Michael (1)Edlin, Aaron S. (1)... View MoreSubject
    United States. Supreme Court (34)
    Judges -- United States (5)Judicial power -- United States (5)Constitutional law -- United States (4)Apportionment (Election law) -- United States (2)Baker, Lynn A., 1957- (2)Civil rights -- United States (2)Election districts -- United States (2)Electronic surveillance -- Law and legislation -- United States (2)Judicial review -- United States (2)... View MoreDate Issued2010 - 2016 (12)2000 - 2009 (11)1990 - 1999 (10)1987 - 1989 (1)Has File(s)Yes (34)

    Search

    Show Advanced FiltersHide Advanced Filters

    Filters

    Use filters to refine the search results.

    Now showing items 1-10 of 34

    • Sort Options:
    • Relevance
    • Title Asc
    • Title Desc
    • Issue Date Asc
    • Issue Date Desc
    • Results Per Page:
    • 5
    • 10
    • 20
    • 40
    • 60
    • 80
    • 100
    Thumbnail

    Having it Both Ways: Proof That the U.S. Supreme Court is "Unfairly" Prosecution-Oriented 

    Slobogin, Christopher, 1951- (Florida Law Review, 1996)
    If the assertions that this essay makes about the Court's "unfair" prosecution-orientation withstand scrutiny,"3 two further conclusions might follow. First, the highest court in the country is so fixated on ensuring that ...
    Thumbnail

    Not "Wrongful" by Any Means: The Court's Decisions in the Redistricting Cases 

    Swain, Carol M. (Carol Miller) (Houston Law Review, 1997)
    Minority representation itself should be viewed by the voting rights community as something much broader than the representation that takes place when voters and legislators share skin pigmentation. The Supreme Court and ...
    Thumbnail

    Res Ipsa Loquitur (Or Why the Other Essays Prove My Point) 

    Sherry, Suzanna (Vanderbilt Law Review, 2013)
    As all the Roundtable essays note, DaimlerChrysler asks the Supreme Court to decide whether and when the in-­forum activities of a corporate subsidiary should give rise to general personal jurisdiction over the corporate ...
    Thumbnail

    The Barking Dog 

    Sherry, Suzanna (Case Western Reserve Law Review, 1996)
    Professor Tushnet, and indeed many of the participants in this symposium, seem to believe that United States v. Lopez will have some lasting significance. Those participants who disagree have suggested that the case's lack ...
    Thumbnail

    Duel Diligence: Second Thoughts About the Supremes as the Sultans of Swing 

    Edelman, Paul H.; Chen, Jim, 1966- (Southern California Law Review, 1996)
    We respond to Professor Lynn A. Baker's criticisms of our article, The Most Dangerous Justice: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Mathematics. Professor Baker fundamentally misunderstands our measure of Supreme Court voting ...
    Thumbnail

    Lafler v. Cooper and AEDPA 

    King, Nancy J., 1958- (Yale Law Journal Online, 2012)
    The Supreme Court in Missouri v. Frye1 and Lafler v. Cooper2 broke new ground by holding for the first time that a defendant’s right to the effective assistance of counsel under the Sixth Amendment can be violated by the ...
    Thumbnail

    The Federal Court System: A Principal-Agent Perspective 

    Tracey, George E., 1967-; Yoon, Albert (Saint Louis University Law Journal, 2003)
    Like Congress, the Supreme Court must delegate a great deal of its work, in this case to lower courts rather than to agencies. Since the Supreme Court is formally at the apex of the judicial pyramid, the Court's decisions ...
    Thumbnail

    Emotional Common Sense as Constitutional Law 

    Maroney, Terry A. (Vanderbilt Law Review, 2009)
    In Gonzales v. Carhart the Supreme Court invoked post-abortion regret to justify a ban on a particular abortion procedure. The Court was proudly folk-psychological, representing its observations about women's emotional ...
    Thumbnail

    Of Dialogue--And Democracy--In Administrative Law 

    Rossi, Jim, 1965- (Columbia Law Review Sidebar, 2012)
    Linda Cohen and Matthew Spitzer's study, "The Government Litigant Advantage," sheds important light on how the Solicitor General's litigation behavior may impact the Supreme Court's decision making agenda and outcomes for ...
    Thumbnail

    Rehnquist and Panvasive Searches 

    Slobogin, Christopher, 1951- (Mississippi Law Journal, 2013)
    In the history of the Supreme Court, William Rehnquist may have been the least friendly justice toward the view that the Fourth Amendment should be read expansively. Even he, however, might have interpreted the amendment ...
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4

    Connect with Vanderbilt Libraries

    Your Vanderbilt

    • Alumni
    • Current Students
    • Faculty & Staff
    • International Students
    • Media
    • Parents & Family
    • Prospective Students
    • Researchers
    • Sports Fans
    • Visitors & Neighbors

    Support the Jean and Alexander Heard Libraries

    Support the Library...Give Now

    Gifts to the Libraries support the learning and research needs of the entire Vanderbilt community. Learn more about giving to the Libraries.

    Become a Friend of the Libraries

    Quick Links

    • Hours
    • About
    • Employment
    • Staff Directory
    • Accessibility Services
    • Contact
    • Vanderbilt Home
    • Privacy Policy