Show simple item record

Improper Appropriation

dc.contributor.authorGervais, Daniel J.
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-05T18:46:09Z
dc.date.available2022-05-05T18:46:09Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citation23 Lewis & Clark Law Review 599 (2019)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1803/17278
dc.descriptionarticle published in a law reviewen_US
dc.description.abstractThe traditional (Arnstein) test for copyright infringement is satisfied when the owner of a valid copyright establishes unauthorized copying by the defendant. To demonstrate unauthorized copying, one of the major tests is that the plaintiff must first show that her work was actually copied; second, she must establish substantial similarity and/or that the copying amounts to an improper or unlawful appropriation. The second prong is satisfied when (i) protected expression in the earlier work was copied and (ii) the amount of the copyrighted work that is copied must be more than de minimis. This Article examines, first, how impropriety has been applied in copyright infringement cases, and, second, whether the test could (doctrinally) and should (normatively) perform additional work as we move ever more into an era of massive creative reuse of existing works, whether as appropriation art, user-generated content or otherwise. The Article suggests that the notion of propriety should play an enhanced role, especially in cases of reuse of pre-existing copyrighted works.en_US
dc.format.extent1 PDF (23 pages)en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherLewis & Clark Law Reviewen_US
dc.subjectcopyrighten_US
dc.subjectinfringementen_US
dc.subjecttesten_US
dc.subjectimproper appropriationen_US
dc.subjectArnsteinen_US
dc.subject.lcshlawen_US
dc.subject.lcshcopyrighten_US
dc.titleImproper Appropriationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.ssrn-urihttps://ssrn.com/abstract=3361747


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record