Show simple item record

Proposed Reforms to Texas Judicial Selection: Panelist Remarks

dc.contributor.authorFitzpatrick, Brian T.
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-02T20:55:06Z
dc.date.available2022-05-02T20:55:06Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citation24 Lewis & Clark Law Review 685 (2020)en_US
dc.identifier.issn1557-6582
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1803/17131
dc.descriptionarticle published in a law reviewen_US
dc.description.abstractMany conservatives oppose much of the administrative state. But many also oppose much of our private enforcement regime. This raises the questions of whether conservatives believe the marketplace should be policed at all, and if so, who exactly should do that policing? In this Essay, based on my new book, The Conservative Case for Class Actions, I take a deep dive into conservative principles to try to answer these questions. I conclude that almost all conservatives believe the marketplace needs at least some legal constraints, and I argue that ex post, private enforcement is superior to the alternatives. Not only is private enforcement the right answer as a matter of theory, but I believe that conservatives need private enforcement as a practical matter if they wish to make progress on their agenda to roll back the administrative state.en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherLewis & Clark Law Reviewen_US
dc.subjectderegulation, administrative state, class actionsen_US
dc.titleProposed Reforms to Texas Judicial Selection: Panelist Remarksen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record