Show simple item record

Antitrust’s High-Tech Exceptionalism

dc.contributor.authorAllensworth, Rebecca H.
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-02T20:46:35Z
dc.date.available2022-05-02T20:46:35Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citation130 YALE L.J.F. 588 (2021)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1803/17120
dc.descriptionpublished articleen_US
dc.description.abstractAmerican competition policy has four big problems: Amazon, Apple, Facebook, and Google. These companies each reign over a sector of the digital marketplace, controlling both the consumer experience and the possibility of competitive entry. This Essay argues that the conventional account of how antitrust law allowed this consolidation of market power - that it failed to evolve to address the market realities of the technology sector-is incomplete. Not only did courts fail to adapt antitrust law from its smoke-stack roots, but they gave big tech special dispensation under traditional antitrust doctrine. Swayed by prevailing utopic views about digital markets in the early 2000s -that they were uniquely dynamic, innovative, and competitive -these courts carved out special exceptions to antitrust rules about tying and the duty to deal with competitors. The tech companies have used this blank check to entrench their market power and keep start-ups from becoming what they themselves once were: the next big thing.en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherYale Law Journal Forumen_US
dc.subjectbig tech, antitrust doctrine, digital marketplace, lack of competitionen_US
dc.titleAntitrust’s High-Tech Exceptionalismen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record