Show simple item record

The Evolving Federal Response to State Marijuana Reforms

dc.contributor.authorMikos, Robert A.
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-02T20:30:26Z
dc.date.available2022-05-02T20:30:26Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citation26 Widener Law Review 1 (2020)en_US
dc.identifier.issn1933-5555
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1803/17114
dc.descriptionpublished articleen_US
dc.description.abstractThe states have launched a revolution in marijuana policy, creating a wide gap between state and federal marijuana law. While nearly every state has legalized marijuana in at least some circumstances, federal law continues to ban the substance outright. Nonetheless, the federal response to state reforms has been anything but static during this revolution. This Essay, based on my Distinguished Speaker Lecture at Delaware Law School, examines how the federal response to state marijuana reforms has evolved over time, from War, to Partial Truce, and, next (possibly) to Capitulation. It also illuminates the ways in which this shifting federal response has alternately constrained and liberated states as they seek to regulate marijuana as they deem fit.en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherWidener Law Reviewen_US
dc.subjectstate marijuana reforms, medical use, legalizationen_US
dc.titleThe Evolving Federal Response to State Marijuana Reformsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record