Show simple item record

Agreement Between Two Procalcitonin Assays in Hospitalized Children

dc.contributor.authorKatz, Sophie E.
dc.contributor.authorSartori, Laura F.
dc.contributor.authorSzeles, Andras
dc.contributor.authorMcHenry, Rendie
dc.contributor.authorStanford, J. Eric
dc.contributor.authorXu, Meng
dc.contributor.authorColby, Jennifer M.
dc.contributor.authorHalasa, Natasha
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Derek J.
dc.contributor.authorBanerjee, Ritu
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-11T14:05:55Z
dc.date.available2020-05-11T14:05:55Z
dc.date.issued2019-09
dc.identifier.citationKatz, S.E., Sartori, L.F., Szeles, A. et al. Agreement Between Two Procalcitonin Assays in Hospitalized Children. Infect Dis Ther 8, 463–468 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40121-019-0250-5en_US
dc.identifier.issn2193-8229
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1803/10004
dc.description.abstractIntroduction Agreement between available procalcitonin (PCT) assays is unclear. We sought to compare concordance between Roche and bioMerieux PCT assays using pediatric samples. Methods We evaluated 213 plasma samples from 208 children. We tested each sample on both the Roche and bioMerieux PCT platforms. Results At ranges < 2 mu g/L, the Roche platform had a mean negative bias of 0.13 mu g/L versus the bioMerieux platform. This bias resulted in PCT levels that crossed accepted cut points in 12.7% of patients. Conclusions PCT levels measured on either platform are similar, especially at PCT ranges used for antibiotic decision-making algorithms. Funding This work was supported by an investigator-initiated research agreement through bioMerieux and by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Childhood Infection Research Program (ChIRP), National Institute of Health and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institute of Health.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by an investigator-initiated research agreement through bioMerieux and by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Childhood Infection Research Program (ChIRP), National Institute of Health and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institute of Health. This content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. All authors had full access to all of the data in this study and take complete responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherInfectious Diseases and Therapyen_US
dc.rightsThis article is published under an open access license. Please check the 'Copyright Information' section for details of this license and what re-use is permitted. If your intended use exceeds what is permitted by the license or if you are unable to locate the licence and re-use information, please contact the Rights and Permissions team.
dc.source.urihttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40121-019-0250-5
dc.subjectMethod comparisonen_US
dc.subjectPediatricsen_US
dc.subjectProcalcitoninen_US
dc.titleAgreement Between Two Procalcitonin Assays in Hospitalized Childrenen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s40121-019-0250-5


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record