Show simple item record

"The Threes"

dc.contributor.authorGeorge, Tracey E.
dc.contributor.authorGuthrie, Chris
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-30T21:33:00Z
dc.date.available2019-04-30T21:33:00Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.citation61 Vanderbilt Law Review 1825 (2008)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1803/9457
dc.descriptionarticle published in a law reviewen_US
dc.description.abstractLaw school professors control the production of lawyers and influence the evolution of law. Understanding who is hired as a tenure-track law professor is of clear importance to debates about the state of legal education in the United States. But while opinions abound on the law school hiring process, little is empirically known about what explains success in the market for law professors. Using a unique and extensive data set of survey responses from candidates in the 2007–2008 legal academic labor market, we examine the factors that influence which candidates are interviewed and ultimately hired by law schools. We find that law schools appear open to nontraditional candidates in the early phases of the hiring process but when it comes to the ultimate decision - hiring - they focus on candidates who look like current law professors.en_US
dc.format.extent1 PDF (37 pages)en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherVanderbilt Law Reviewen_US
dc.subjectjudicial processen_US
dc.subjectdecision makingen_US
dc.subjectUnited States Supreme Courten_US
dc.subjectpanelsen_US
dc.subjecten bancen_US
dc.subject.lcshlawen_US
dc.subject.lcshcourtsen_US
dc.subject.lcshjudgesen_US
dc.subject.lcshSupreme Court of the United Statesen_US
dc.title"The Threes"en_US
dc.title.alternativeRe-Imagining Supreme Court Decisionmakingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.ssrn-urihttps://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2381035


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record