| dc.contributor.author | Ruhl, J. B. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Salzman, James | |
| dc.contributor.author | Nash, Jonathan Remy | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2016-05-07T17:55:53Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2016-05-07T17:55:53Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 32 Pace Environmental Law Review 481 (2015) | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1803/7568 | |
| dc.description | article published in law review | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Given the political dynamic in play at the national level, with the country evenly split between Republicans and Democrats, and incumbent Tea Party and other politicians highly critical of the EPA, there is no reason to think this trend in decreasing environmental budgets will change any time soon. In some states the trend is even more pronounced. Fiscal austerity has become the new norm. The interesting questions are whether this matters for environmental law, how it matters, and what it means going forward. | en_US |
| dc.format.extent | 1 PDF (13 pages) | en_US |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Pace Environmental Law Review | en_US |
| dc.subject.lcsh | Environmental law -- United States -- Economic aspects | en_US |
| dc.subject.lcsh | United States. Environmental Protection Agency | en_US |
| dc.subject.lcsh | Environmental monitoring | en_US |
| dc.title | Environmental Law in Austerity | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
