Show simple item record

Testing the Value of Eminent Domain

dc.contributor.authorSerkin, Christopher
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-30T14:04:08Z
dc.date.available2015-12-30T14:04:08Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citation89 Tul. L. Rev. 115 (2014)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1803/7406
dc.descriptionarticle published in law reviewen_US
dc.description.abstractIn their article (Guarding the Subjective Premium), Sebastien Gay and Nadia Nasser-Ghodsi add some empirical evidence to the ongoing debate over compensation for eminent domain.' Their model raises a number of interesting questions, some of which are identified below, but their principal contribution is actually conceptual. They identify countervailing pressures on property values resulting from the possibility of eminent domain. On the one hand, they hypothesize that property buyers will discount the value of property at risk of eminent domain. On the other, they identify the offsetting premium that buyers should pay for a community's economically beneficial use of eminent domain, an effect too often ignored by courts, scholars, and politicians. Gay and Nasser-Ghodsi perform an important service by drawing attention to these potential benefits of eminent domain.en_US
dc.format.extent1 PDF (12 pages)en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherTulane Law Reviewen_US
dc.subject.lcshEminent domainen_US
dc.subject.lcshGay, Sebastienen_US
dc.subject.lcshNasser-Ghodsi, Nadiaen_US
dc.subject.lcshEminent domain -- Economic aspectsen_US
dc.titleTesting the Value of Eminent Domainen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record