dc.contributor.author | Viscusi, W. Kip | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-12-22T14:18:16Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-12-22T14:18:16Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1991 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 14 Regulation 50 (1991) | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1803/7395 | |
dc.description | article published in a journal of administrative law | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Risk regulations are generally based on a stylized view of the behavior of the individuals affected by the regulation. These behavioral assumptions establish the basis for regulation and also influence the character of the regulation that will be pursed. The mix of behavioral assumptions that provides the basis for policy is often inconsistent. In some cases policymakers assume that irrationality prevails if that assumption will promote government intervention. If, however, individual perception of the risk and response to it is required to make a policy effective, risk regulators do not recongnize individuals' cognitive limitations. These stylized views of risk-taking behavior are often sharply contradicted by empirical evidence on individual behavior. Errors in judgment and decisions do exist, but all too often these errors provide the impetus for a government policy. The net effect is that these policies often reinforce market failtures rather than eliminate them. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 1 PDF (10 pages) | en_US |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | Regulation | en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh | Risk perception | en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh | Risk management -- Law and legislation | en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh | Risk assessment -- Law and legislation | en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh | Risk-taking (Psychology) | en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh | Industrial safety -- Government policy | en_US |
dc.title | Risk Perceptions in Regulation, Tort Liability, and the Market | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |