Show simple item record

Capacity to Contest a Search and Seizure: the Passing of Old Rules and Some Suggestions for New Ones

dc.contributor.authorSlobogin, Christopher, 1951-
dc.date.accessioned2013-12-09T17:59:32Z
dc.date.available2013-12-09T17:59:32Z
dc.date.issued1981
dc.identifier.citation18 Am. Crim. L. Rev. 387 (1981)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1803/5767
dc.description.abstractProfessor Slobogin examines recent Supreme Court decisions involving standing to challenge search and seizure violations, and argues that the Court's commitment to a "totality of the circumstances" approach has permitted erosion of fourth amendment protections. After concluding that these decisions provide little guidance to lower courts, Professor Slobogin offers a set of principles which will aid in analyzing the Court's direction.en_US
dc.format.extent1 document (33 pages)en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Criminal Law Reviewen_US
dc.subject.lcshSearches and seizures -- United Statesen_US
dc.subject.lcshUnited States. Constitution. 4th Amendmenten_US
dc.titleCapacity to Contest a Search and Seizure: the Passing of Old Rules and Some Suggestions for New Onesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record