Show simple item record

Why Every State Should Have an Income Tax (and a Retail Sales Tax, Too)

dc.contributor.authorSchlunk, Herwig J.
dc.date.accessioned2013-11-11T22:12:43Z
dc.date.available2013-11-11T22:12:43Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.citation78 Miss. L.J. 637 (2008-2009)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1803/5638
dc.description.abstractSome states (like Florida and Texas) collect retail sales taxes but no income taxes; one state (Oregon) collects income taxes but no retail sales taxes; most states collect both. This paper examines the decision of a state to collect retail sales taxes, income taxes, or both in light of the state's spending policy and the ability of at least some of the state's residents to strategically migrate to another state (to take advantage of a more favorable mix of taxes and benefits). It concludes that states that rely solely (or even primarily) on either a retail sales tax or an income tax to finance their spending are generally pursuing an irrational and ultimately unstable course. Thus, states that seek to pursue an ultimately stable course must include in their revenue streams both a retail sales tax and an income tax.en_US
dc.format.extent1 document (69 pages)en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherMississippi Law Journalen_US
dc.subject.lcshIncome tax -- United States -- Statesen_US
dc.subject.lcshSales tax -- United States -- Statesen_US
dc.subject.lcshTaxation -- United States -- Statesen_US
dc.subject.lcshU.S. states -- Economic policyen_US
dc.titleWhy Every State Should Have an Income Tax (and a Retail Sales Tax, Too)en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record