Now showing items 1-20 of 34

    • King, Nancy J., 1958-; Applebaum, Brynne (Federal Sentencing Reporter, 2014)
      This article addresses the impact of Alleyne v. United States on statutes that restrict an offender’s eligibility for release on parole or probation. Alleyne is the latest of several Supreme Court decisions applying the ...
    • King, Nancy J., 1958- (Law and Contemporary Problems, 1999)
      As juries become both less common and more expensive, some have questioned the wisdom of preserving the criminal jury in its present form. The benefits of the jury are difficult to quantify, but jury verdicts continue to ...
    • King, Nancy J., 1958-; O'Neill, Michael E. (Duke Law Journal, 2005)
      This paper is the first empirical analysis of appeal waivers clauses in plea agreements by which defendants waive their rights to appellate and postconviction review. Based on interviews and an analysis of data coded from ...
    • King, Nancy J., 1958-; Klein, Susan Riva, 1962- (Stanford Law Review, 2001)
      Before "Apprendi", prosecutors using recidivism as a club could, and did, regularly insist that defendants admit aggravating facts as part of the plea or face additional time. When the prosecutor's threats of added time ...
    • King, Nancy J., 1958-; Klein, Susan Riva, 1962- (Federal Sentencing Reporter, 2000)
      The Court in Apprendi v. New Jersey, ___ U.S. ___ (2000), held as a matter of due process that any fact, other than a prior conviction, that increases the penalty for an offense beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must ...
    • King, Nancy J., 1958- (Chicago-Kent Law Review, 1998)
      The choice of whether to adopt or preserve judicial peremptories should not turn on the resolution of one issue. The risk that such challenges will be used to discriminate between judges on the basis of race must be ...
    • King, Nancy J., 1958-; Klein, Susan Riva, 1962- (Federal Sentencing Reporter, 2004)
      Federal criminal sentencing in the wake of Blakely v. Washington is, to put it charitably, a mess. In holding that Blakely's sentence under the Washington State Sentencing Guidelines was imposed in a manner inconsistent ...
    • King, Nancy J., 1958- (American Criminal Law Review, 1994)
      In "Powers v. Ohio," the Court held that a peremptory challenge based on race violates the equal protection right of the challenged veniremember not to have her opportunities for jury service determined by her skin color. ...
    • King, Nancy J., 1958- (Yale Law Journal, 2013)
      This Essay argues that the Court’s effort to expand habeas review of ineffective assistance of counsel claims in Martinez v. Ryan will make little difference in either the enforcement of the right to the effective assistance ...
    • King, Nancy J., 1958-; Klein, Susan Riva, 1962- (Vanderbilt Law Review, 2001)
      The Court has struggled for well over a century with the issue of who has final authority to define what is a "crime" for purposes of applying procedural protections guaranteed by the Constitution in criminal cases. Just ...
    • King, Nancy J., 1958-; Noble, Rosevelt L. (Vanderbilt Law Review, 2004)
      Jury sentencing in non-capital cases is one of the least understood procedures in contemporary American criminal justice. This Article looks beyond idealized visions of jury sentencing to examine for the first time how ...
    • King, Nancy J., 1958-; Sherry, Suzanna (Duke Law Journal, 2008)
      This Article tells the story of how fundamental shifts in state sentencing policy collided with fundamental shifts in federal habeas policy to produce a tangled and costly doctrinal wreck. The conventional assumption is ...
    • King, Nancy J., 1958- (Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 2004)
      Drawing upon a recent study of felony jury sentencing in Kentucky, Virginia, and Arkansas, this essay highlights some of the similarities and differences between jury sentencing in capital cases and jury sentencing in ...
    • King, Nancy J., 1958- (Stanford Law Review, 2005)
      Prosecutors control statutory ranges by selecting charges. In addition, prosecutors decide whether to use or forego special sentencing statutes that carry mandatory minimum penalties higher than the maximum Guidelines ...
    • King, Nancy J., 1958- (SMU Law Review, 2014)
      This essay offers a menu of procedural alternatives for coping with the potential, some would say inevitable, abandonment of the prior conviction exception to the rule in Apprendi v. New Jersey. It compiles options states ...
    • King, Nancy J., 1958- (Michigan Law Review, 1996)
      This article examines two aspects of the jury system that have attracted far less attention from scholars than from the popular press: avoidance of jury duty by some citizens, and misconduct while serving by others. ...
    • King, Nancy J., 1958- (Yale Law Journal Online, 2012)
      The Supreme Court in Missouri v. Frye1 and Lafler v. Cooper2 broke new ground by holding for the first time that a defendant’s right to the effective assistance of counsel under the Sixth Amendment can be violated by the ...
    • King, Nancy J., 1958- (Vanderbilt Law Review, 1996)
      We ask a lot of our jurors. The financial and emotional burdens of jury duty can be significant even in mundane cases. Deciding another's fate is often a trying ordeal, aggravated by unintelligible instructions, hostile ...
    • King, Nancy J., 1958- (Federal Sentencing Reporter, 2012)
      n 2007, researchers from the National Center for State Courts and Vanderbilt University Law School reported the findings from a study of litigation in 2384 randomly selected, non-capital habeas cases, approximately 6.5% ...
    • King, Nancy J., 1958- (Marquette Lawyer Magazine, 2014)
      On November 18, 2013, Nancy J. King, the Lee S. and Charles A. Speir Professor at Vanderbilt Law School, delivered Marquette Law School’s annual George and Margaret Barrock Lecture in Criminal Law. This is an abridgment ...