Show simple item record

Review Paper on Penetrating Brain Injury Ethical Quandaries in the Trauma Bay and Beyond

dc.contributor.authorBeyene, Robel
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-09T17:58:15Z
dc.date.available2023-02-09T17:58:15Z
dc.date.issued2023-01-28
dc.identifier.citationZakrison, Tanya L. MD, MPH*; Essig, Rachael MD*; Polcari, Ann MD, MSPH*; McKinley, William MD*; Arnold, Damon MD, MPH†; Beyene, Robel MD‡; Wilson, Kenneth MD*; Rogers, Selwyn Jr MD, MPH*; Matthews, Jeffrey B. MD*; Millis, J. Michael MD*; Angelos, Peter MD, PhD*; O’Connor, Michael MD§; Mansour, Ali MD∥; Goldenberg, Fernando MD∥; Spiegel, Thomas MD¶; Horowitz, Peleg MD, PhD#; Das, Paramita MD, MS#; Slidell, Mark MD, MPH*; Chokshi, Nikunj MD*; Okeke, Iheoma MA**; Barth, Rolf MD*; Wilkins, Harry E. III MD, MHCM**; Kass-Hout, Tareq MD∥; Lazaridis, Christos MD∥. Review Paper on Penetrating Brain Injury: Ethical Quandaries in the Trauma Bay and Beyond. Annals of Surgery 277(1):p 66-72, January 2023. | DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005608en_US
dc.identifier.issn0003-4932
dc.identifier.othereISSN 1528-1140
dc.identifier.otherPubMed ID35997268
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1803/17993
dc.descriptionOnly Vanderbilt University affiliated authors are listed on VUIR. For a full list of authors, access the version of record at https://journals.lww.com/annalsofsurgery/Fulltext/2023/01000/Review_Paper_on_Penetrating_Brain_Injury__Ethical.12.aspxen_US
dc.description.abstractObjective:The aim of this review was to review the ethical and multidisciplinary clinical challenges facing trauma surgeons when resuscitating patients presenting with penetrating brain injury (PBI) and multicavitary trauma. Background:While there is a significant gap in the literature on managing PBI in patients presenting with multisystem trauma, recent data demonstrate that resuscitation and prognostic features for such patients remains poorly described, with trauma guidelines out of date in this field. Methods:We reviewed a combination of recent multidisciplinary evidence-informed guidelines for PBI and coupled this with expert opinion from trauma, neurosurgery, neurocritical care, pediatric and transplant surgery, surgical ethics and importantly our community partners. Results:Traditional prognostic signs utilized in traumatic brain injury may not be applicable to PBI with a multidisciplinary team approach suggested on a case-by-case basis. Even with no role for neurosurgical intervention, neurocritical care, and neurointerventional support may be warranted, in parallel to multicavitary operative intervention. Special considerations should be afforded for pediatric PBI. Ethical considerations center on providing the patient with the best chance of survival. Consideration of organ donation should be considered as part of the continuum of patient, proxy and family-centric support and care. Community input is crucial in guiding decision making or protocol establishment on an institutional level. Conclusions:Support of the patient after multicavitary PBI can be complex and is best addressed in a multidisciplinary fashion with extensive community involvement.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherAnnals Of Surgeryen_US
dc.rightsThis article is available under the Creative Commons CC-BY-NC-ND license and permits non-commercial use of the work as published, without adaptation or alteration provided the work is fully attributed.
dc.source.urihttps://journals.lww.com/annalsofsurgery/Fulltext/2023/01000/Review_Paper_on_Penetrating_Brain_Injury__Ethical.12.aspx
dc.subjectethicsen_US
dc.subjectmulticavitary trauma;en_US
dc.subjectpenetrating brain injuryen_US
dc.subjectstructural racismen_US
dc.subjecttransplanten_US
dc.titleReview Paper on Penetrating Brain Injury Ethical Quandaries in the Trauma Bay and Beyonden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/SLA.0000000000005608


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record