Show simple item record

A Response to Calls for SEC-Mandated ESG Disclosure

dc.contributor.authorRose, Amanda M.
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-05T18:36:42Z
dc.date.available2022-05-05T18:36:42Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citation98 Wash. U. L. Rev. 1821 (2021)en_US
dc.identifier.issn0043-0862
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1803/17201
dc.descriptionarticle published in a law reviewen_US
dc.description.abstractThis Article responds to recent proposals calling for the SEC to adopt a mandatory ESG-disclosure framework. It illustrates how the breadth and vagueness of these proposals obscures the important-and controversial- policy questions that would need to be addressed before the SEC could move forward on the proposals in a principled way. The questions raised include some of the most contested in the field of corporate and securities law, such as the value of interjurisdictional competition for corporate charters, the right way to conceptualize the purpose of the corporation, the proper allocation of managerial power as between the board and shareholders, and the social desirability of fraud-on-the-market class actions.en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherWashington University Law Reviewen_US
dc.subjectenvironmental, social and governance topics, investor corporate stakeholders, agency costsen_US
dc.titleA Response to Calls for SEC-Mandated ESG Disclosureen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record