Show simple item record

Recovery of Motor Function after Mixed and Motor Nerve Repair with Processed Nerve Allograft

dc.contributor.authorSafa, Bauback
dc.contributor.authorShores, Jaimie T.
dc.contributor.authorIngari, John, V.
dc.contributor.authorWeber, Renata, V.
dc.contributor.authorCho, Mickey
dc.contributor.authorZoldos, Jozef
dc.contributor.authorNiacaras, Timothy R.
dc.contributor.authorNesti, Leon J.
dc.contributor.authorThayer, Wesley P.
dc.contributor.authorBuncke, Gregory M.
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-21T17:51:10Z
dc.date.available2020-07-21T17:51:10Z
dc.date.issued2019-03
dc.identifier.citationSafa, B., Shores, J. T., Ingari, J. V., Weber, R. V., Cho, M., Zoldos, J., Niacaras, T. R., Nesti, L. J., Thayer, W. P., & Buncke, G. M. (2019). Recovery of Motor Function after Mixed and Motor Nerve Repair with Processed Nerve Allograft. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 7(3), e2163. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002163en_US
dc.identifier.issn2169-7574
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1803/10222
dc.description.abstractBackground : Severe trauma often results in the transection of major peripheral nerves. The RANGER Registry is an ongoing observational study on the use and outcomes of processed nerve allografts (PNAs; Avance Nerve Graft, AxoGen, Inc., Alachua, Fla.). Here, we report on motor recovery outcomes for nerve injuries repaired acutely or in a delayed fashion with PNA and comparisons to historical controls in the literature. Methods: The RANGER database was queried for mixed and motor nerve injuries in the upper extremities, head, and neck area having completed greater than 1 year of follow-up. All subjects with sufficient assessments to evaluate functional outcomes were included. Meaningful recovery was defined as >= M3 on the Medical Research Council scale. Demographics, outcomes, and covariate analysis were performed to further characterize this subgroup. Results: The subgroup included 20 subjects with 22 nerve repairs. The mean +/- SD (minimum-maximum) age was 38 +/- 19 (16-77) years. The median repair time was 9 (0-133) days. The mean graft length was 33 +/- 17 (10-70) mm with a mean follow-up of 779 +/- 480 (371-2,423) days. Meaningful motor recovery was observed in 73%. Subgroup analysis showed no differences between gap lengths or mechanism of injury. There were no related adverse events. Conclusions: PNAs were safe and provided functional motor recovery in mixed and motor nerve repairs. Outcomes compare favorably to historical controls for nerve autograft and exceed those for hollow tube conduit. PNA may be considered as an option when reconstructing major peripheral nerve injuries.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery-Global OPENen_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
dc.source.urihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6467606/
dc.subjectULNAR NERVEen_US
dc.subjectSURGICAL-MANAGEMENTen_US
dc.subjectPOLYGLYCOLIC ACIDen_US
dc.subjectSENSORY RECOVERYen_US
dc.subjectRECONSTRUCTIONen_US
dc.subjectOUTCOMESen_US
dc.subjectINJURIESen_US
dc.subjectCONDUITSen_US
dc.subjectMULTICENTERen_US
dc.titleRecovery of Motor Function after Mixed and Motor Nerve Repair with Processed Nerve Allograften_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/GOX.0000000000002163


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record