Show simple item record

The Implications of Prison Privatization on the Conduct of Prisoner Litigation Under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983

dc.contributor.authorKay, Susan L.
dc.contributor.authorKay, Susan L.
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-01T23:20:35Z
dc.date.available2015-06-01T23:20:35Z
dc.date.issued1987
dc.identifier.citation40 Vand. L. Rev. 867 (1987)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1803/7067
dc.descriptionarticle published in law reviewen_US
dc.description.abstractPrisoners often seek redress in federal courts through causes of action brought under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 for violations of their constitutional rights caused by the overall condition of their confinement or by one specific condition or incident. Although commentators disagree over the extent to which these cases burden federal district courts, They agree that prisoner litigation constitutes a large percentage of the civil rights litigation in district courts. One of the attractions of prison privatization for state and local governments is the belief that contracting prison management to private firms will relieve the government of the burden of defending the multitude of individual and class-wide civil rights actions and the expense of complying with comprehensive and often financially burdensome court orders. Several reasons may explain the inmates' choice to litigate constitutional claims in federal court rather than litigating them as tort actions in state court, but two reasons predominate. First, most state legislatures have immunized state officials from suit in state court for actions arising from their official conduct. Inmates either have no recourse in state court or are forced to proceed in a manner other than a trial before a jury. Second, and possibly even more important, prisoners perceive that federal courts possess an aura of justice and dignity that they find lacking in state courts. Because of this fascination with federal court, there is every reason to expect that if private contractors operate state or local correctional facilities, prisoners will continue to seek redress in federal court through Section 1983, despite an enhanced ability to bring a state court action against a prison operator occasioned by diminished immunity for a private contractor.en_US
dc.format.extent1 PDF (24 pages)en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherVanderbilt Law Reviewen_US
dc.subjectPrisoner litigationen_US
dc.subjectPrison privatizationen_US
dc.subjectUnited States Code Section 1983en_US
dc.subject.lcshPrisons -- United Statesen_US
dc.subject.lcshPrivatization -- United Statesen_US
dc.subject.lcshCorrections -- Contracting out -- United Statesen_US
dc.subject.lcshPrisoners -- Legal status, laws, etc. -- United Statesen_US
dc.subject.lcshActions and defenses -- United Statesen_US
dc.subject.lcshDistrict courts -- United Statesen_US
dc.subject.lcshState action (Civil rights) -- United Statesen_US
dc.subject.lcshConstitutional torts -- United Statesen_US
dc.subject.lcshPrisoners -- Civil rights -- United Statesen_US
dc.subject.lcshGrievance procedures for prisoners -- United Statesen_US
dc.titleThe Implications of Prison Privatization on the Conduct of Prisoner Litigation Under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record