Show simple item record

Waivers, Flexibility, and Reviewability

dc.contributor.authorRossi, Jim, 1965-
dc.date.accessioned2015-04-09T20:55:39Z
dc.date.available2015-04-09T20:55:39Z
dc.date.issued1997
dc.identifier.citation72 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 1359 (1997)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1803/6942
dc.descriptionarticle published in law reviewen_US
dc.description.abstractIn this Comment, I shall explore the issue of reviewability, as discussed by Krent, in the context of one flexible approach to regulation-- express agency waiver of regulations. Part I of this Comment addresses the increased need for flexible solutions in the administrative context, such as waiver of rules, and provides some examples. Part II argues that, especially in the context of flexible regulatory approaches, Heckler v. Chaney, a key case for determining whether courts will review agency decisions, should not be given a reading that precludes review of agency inaction. It should be read to value consistency with program purposes and across similar adjudicative cases, as well as consistency with the letter of published regulations. In Part III, I suggest that Krent's process proposal may provide for too little oversight of agency decisionmaking in the waiver context. In considering appeals of agency flexibility decisions, such as administrative waiver of regulation, courts should generally err in favor of, rather than against, reviewability; in the waiver context, the third-party reliance approach examined by Krent provides a more legitimate approach than the process approach for determining the appropriateness of review.en_US
dc.format.extent1 PDF (19 pages)en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherChicago -Kent Law Reviewen_US
dc.subjectReviewabilityen_US
dc.subjectRegulationen_US
dc.subjectFlexibilityen_US
dc.subjectFlexible regulationen_US
dc.subjectHeckler v. Chaneyen_US
dc.subjectReviewing agency action for inconsistency with prior rules and regulationsen_US
dc.subject.lcshAdministrative agencies -- United Statesen_US
dc.subject.lcshAdministrative law -- United Statesen_US
dc.subject.lcshJudicial review -- United Statesen_US
dc.subject.lcshWaiver -- United Statesen_US
dc.subject.lcshKrent, Harold J.en_US
dc.subject.lcshUnited States. Administrative Procedure Acten_US
dc.subject.lcshAdministrative procedure -- United Statesen_US
dc.titleWaivers, Flexibility, and Reviewabilityen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record