Show simple item record

Beyond Blakely

dc.contributor.authorKing, Nancy J., 1958-
dc.contributor.authorKlein, Susan Riva, 1962-
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-20T21:56:30Z
dc.date.available2014-10-20T21:56:30Z
dc.date.issued2004
dc.identifier.citation16 Fed. Sent. R. 316 (2004)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1803/6793
dc.descriptionarticle published in law reporteren_US
dc.description.abstractFederal criminal sentencing in the wake of Blakely v. Washington is, to put it charitably, a mess. In holding that Blakely's sentence under the Washington State Sentencing Guidelines was imposed in a manner inconsistent with the Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial, the decision threatens the operation of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines and the presumptive sentencing systems in fourteen states. In Parts I and II of this article, we address how Blakely has affected the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, and how assistant U.S. attorneys, federal public defenders, and district and appellate court judges might proceed in a post-Blakely world. In Part III, we discuss Blakely challenges raised in cases on direct and collateral review. Finally, in Part IV, we collect some of the various options for reform open to Congress.en_US
dc.format.extent1 PDF (18 pages)en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherFederal Sentencing Reporteren_US
dc.subjectBlakely v. Washingtonen_US
dc.subject.lcshSentences (Criminal procedure) -- United Statesen_US
dc.titleBeyond Blakelyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.ssrn-urihttp://ssrn.com/abstract=570161


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record