Show simple item record

The 200,000 Cards of Dimitri Yurasov: Further Reflections on Scholarship and Truth

dc.contributor.authorSherry, Suzanna
dc.contributor.authorFarber, Daniel A., 1950-
dc.identifier.citation46 Stan. L. Rev. 647 (1994)en_US
dc.descriptionarticle published in law reviewen_US
dc.description.abstractLast April, Professors Daniel Farber and Suzanna Sherry published a critique in these pages of the legal storytelling movement. Their legal position has been the subject of several responses, including an essay by Professor William Eskridge in this issue. In reply, Professors Farber and Sherry challenge their critics' reliance on postmodern views such as social constructionism. Social constructionism, according to Farber and Sherry, embraces forms of community that would be destructive to the scholarly enterprise. It also risks conflating scholarship with politics in ways harmful to both. More generally, Farber and Sherry contend, postmodernism lacks any clear lessons for legal scholarship and possesses at best a contingent connection with progressive change.en_US
dc.format.extentPDF (17 pages)en_US
dc.publisherStanford Law Reviewen_US
dc.subject.lcshSocial constructionismen_US
dc.subject.lcshLaw -- Study and teachingen_US
dc.titleThe 200,000 Cards of Dimitri Yurasov: Further Reflections on Scholarship and Truthen_US

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record