| dc.contributor.author | Ruhl, J. B. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2013-11-07T18:49:33Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2013-11-07T18:49:33Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2003 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 87 Minn. L. Rev. 885 (2002-2003) | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1803/5621 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The Article evaluates the Endangered Species Act using Dan Farber's theory of eco-pragmatism. Eco-pragmatism employs environmental baselines, a moderated precautionary principle, and adaptive management to mediate environmental policy issues. I conclude that the ESA reflects some of these attributes, but does not coherently assemble a truly eco-pragmatic framework. | en_US |
| dc.format.extent | 1 document (59 pages) | en_US |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Minnesota Law Review | en_US |
| dc.subject.lcsh | United States. Endangered Species Act of 1973 | en_US |
| dc.subject.lcsh | Environmental policy -- United States | en_US |
| dc.subject.lcsh | Farber, Daniel A., 1950- Eco-pragmatism | en_US |
| dc.title | Is the Endangered Species Act Ecopragmatic? | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
| dc.identifier.ssrn-uri | http://ssrn.com/abstract=1106408 | |
