Search
Now showing items 1-10 of 11
The Federal Court System: A Principal-Agent Perspective
(Saint Louis University Law Journal, 2003)
Like Congress, the Supreme Court must delegate a great deal of its work, in this case to lower courts rather than to agencies. Since the Supreme Court is formally at the apex of the judicial pyramid, the Court's decisions ...
Emotional Common Sense as Constitutional Law
(Vanderbilt Law Review, 2009)
In Gonzales v. Carhart the Supreme Court invoked post-abortion regret to justify a ban on a particular abortion procedure. The Court was proudly folk-psychological, representing its observations about women's emotional ...
The Most Dangerous Justice Rides into the Sunset
(Constitutional Commentary, 2007)
In this essay, our third and last in a series, we employ our previously developed techniques to measure the power of the Justices in the Rehnquist Court over its full 11 year run. Once again, Justice Kennedy rises to the ...
Irresponsibility Breeds Contempt
(Green Bag 2D, 2002)
Everyone is picking on the Supreme Court these days. To be sure, some of the
criticism is warranted: the Court has butchered history - to say nothing of constitutional
text - in its attempt to interpret the Eleventh ...
What's Law Got to Do With It?
(Perspectives on Politics, 2004)
The authors of this fascinating study modestly disclaim its significance, yet suggest that the results prove their model a success. As a legal expert, I have a rather different perspective on the results. I look at the ...
How is Constitutional Law Made?
(Michigan Law Review, 2002)
Professors George and Pushaw review Maxwell L. Stearns’ book, "Constitutional Process: A Social Choice Analysis of Supreme Court decision making." In his book, Stearns demonstrates that the U.S. Supreme Court fashions ...
Justice Ginsburg's Gradualism in Criminal Procedure
(Ohio State Law Journal, 2009)
This article, written for a symposium analyzing Justice Ginsburg’s jurisprudence on the 15th anniversary of her tenure on the Supreme Court, is the first sustained look at her views on criminal procedure issues (search and ...
From Judge to Justice: Social Background Theory and the Supreme Court
(North Carolina Law Review, 2008)
The Roberts Court Justices already have revealed many differences from one another, but they also share a (possibly) significant commonality: Presidents promoted all of them to the U.S. Supreme Court from the U.S. Courts ...
Federalism and Accountability
(California Law Review, 2007)
This article examines how one particular state institution, state attorneys general (SAGs), has operated within a unique set of institutional and political constraints to create state-based regulation with nationwide impact ...
The Forest and the Trees
(Vanderbilt Lawyer, 2002)
Ask those who carefully follow the Supreme Court, and they will tell you that--for good or bad, depending on their perspective--the current Supreme Court has reduced to near rubble the metaphorical wall separating church ...