Show simple item record

Labor Market for New Ph.D.s in 2002

dc.contributor.authorStock, Wendy A.
dc.contributor.authorSiegfried, John J.
dc.identifier.citationSiegfried, John J. and Wendy A. Stock. "The Labor Market for New Ph.D.s in 2002." Working Paper No. 04-W01. Dept. of Economics, Vanderbilt University. Nashville, TN, Jan. 2004.en
dc.description.abstractThis paper reports results from a survey of the labor market experience of the 2001-02 class of Ph.D. economists. We estimate that 850 economics Ph.D.s were awarded by U.S. universities in 2001-02, down about 100 from five years earlier. Of these, 28 percent were women, and 37 percent U.S. citizens and permanent residents. On average, the graduates took 5.4 years to earn their Ph.D.s. Over 97 percent of the graduates secured a full-time job; 82 percent held permanent jobs; 59 percent were in academe. Ninety-four percent of respondents reported that they like their job. Those who do less research are more likely to be dissatisfied. The median salary of those holding full-time jobs in the U.S. is $74,000, up from $54,000 five years earlier, a compounded annual increase of 6.5 percent. Salaries of starting assistant professors are now significantly larger than the average of incumbent assistant professors at similar category institutions. Salary compression has progressed to salary inversion. A two-tier job market is emerging in academe, as the gap between the median annual nine-month salary of permanent (tenure-track) and temporary (visiting) academics has widened to $21,500. Nevertheless, 86 percent of the doctorates report that had they known at matriculation what they know now, they still would have pursued a Ph.D. in economics.en
dc.format.extent223335 bytes
dc.publisherVanderbilt University. Dept. of Economicsen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking Paper
dc.subjectLabor marketen
dc.titleLabor Market for New Ph.D.s in 2002en
dc.typeWorking Paperen

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record