Show simple item record

Smartphone apps for cancer: A content analysis of the digital health marketplace

dc.contributor.authorCharbonneau, Deborah H.
dc.contributor.authorHightower, Shonee
dc.contributor.authorKatz, Anne
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Ke
dc.contributor.authorAbrams, Judith
dc.contributor.authorSenft, Nicole
dc.contributor.authorBeebe-Dimmer, Jennifer L.
dc.contributor.authorHeath, Elisabeth
dc.contributor.authorEaton, Tara
dc.contributor.authorThompson, Hayley S.
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-22T16:26:01Z
dc.date.available2020-10-22T16:26:01Z
dc.date.issued2020-02
dc.identifier.citationCharbonneau, D. H., Hightower, S., Katz, A., Zhang, K., Abrams, J., Senft, N., Beebe-Dimmer, J. L., Heath, E., Eaton, T., & Thompson, H. S. (2020). Smartphone apps for cancer: A content analysis of the digital health marketplace. Digital health, 6, 2055207620905413. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207620905413en_US
dc.identifier.issn2055-2076
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1803/16242
dc.description.abstractObjective The purpose of this study was to examine the state of smartphone applications for cancer intended for the general public with a focus on interactive features, content sources, and application developer affiliations. The level of health provider involvement in screening or appraising application content was also assessed. Methods A total of 123 apps were identified for analysis from two major mobile application marketplaces (Apple iTunes = 40; Google Play = 83). Application characteristics were collected, analyzed, and reported. These included the mobile platform, cost, application developer affiliation, date of last update, purpose of application, content sources, and interactive features. Results In the study sample, 50% of the applications focused on general information for cancer (62/123). Next, this was followed by applications for breast cancer (15%, 19/123) and skin cancer (7%, 8/123). Only 10% of application descriptions (12/123) identified sources for application content. Interactive features included the ability to monitor symptoms, side effects, treatments, and chronic pain (20%, 25/123). Only 3% of the applications (4/123) stated content had been evaluated by health providers. Conclusions This study contributes an updated analysis of applications for cancer available in the digital health marketplace. The findings have implications for information quality and supportive resources for cancer care. More transparent information about content sources, organizational affiliations, and level of health provider oversight in screening application content is warranted. Recommendations for improving the quality of cancer applications are also offered. Keywordsen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (RO1 HS022955-01A).en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherDigital Healthen_US
dc.rightsCopyright © The Author(s) 2020 Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
dc.source.urihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7016299/
dc.subjectcanceren_US
dc.subjectdigital healthen_US
dc.subjectinformation resourcesen_US
dc.subjectmobile applicationsen_US
dc.subjectoncologyen_US
dc.subjectqualityen_US
dc.titleSmartphone apps for cancer: A content analysis of the digital health marketplaceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/2055207620905413


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record