• About
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   Institutional Repository Home
    • College of Arts and Science
    • Department of Economics
    • Working Papers
    • View Item
    •   Institutional Repository Home
    • College of Arts and Science
    • Department of Economics
    • Working Papers
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of Institutional RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Determining the Optimal Sample Size for Contingent Valuation Surveys

    Vaughan, William J.
    Russell, Clifford S.
    Darling, Arthur H.
    : http://hdl.handle.net/1803/15660
    : 2000

    Abstract

    Fundamentally, this paper is about the value of information. Whenever a cost-benefit analysis has to be undertaken using benefits that are estimated from household survey data the size of the survey sample must be specified. The most obvious case in the valuation of environmental amenity improvements through contingent valuation (CV) surveys of willingness to pay. One of the first questions that has to be answered in the survey design process is "How many subjects should be interviewed?" The answer can have significant implications for the cost of project preparation. Traditionally, the sample size question has been answered in an ad hoc way either be dividing an exogenously fixed survey budget by the cost per interview or employing some variant of a standard statistical tolerance interval formula. Neither of these approaches can balance the gains to additional sampling effort against the extra interviewing costs. A better answer if not to be found in the environmental economics literature, though it can be developed by adapting a Bayesian decision analysis approach from business statistics. The paper explains and illustrates, with a worked example, the rationale for and mechanics of a sequential Bayesian optimization technique, which is applicable when there is some monetary payoff to alternative courses of action that can be linked to the sample data. In this sense, unlike pure valuation studies that are unconnected to a policy decision, investigators who use contingent valuation results directly in cost-benefit analysis have a hidden advantage that can be exploited to optimize the sample size. The advantage lies in the link between willingness to pay and the decision variable, the net present value of the prospective investment. The core objective of the paper is practical. Readers without a statistical background can easily implement the method. An Appendix shows how, with just six key pieces of information, anyone can solve the optimal sample size problem in a spreadsheet. An automated spreadsheet algorithm is available from the authors on request. To run the program all the users has to do is enter the key data and then activate a macro that automatically computes the optimum number of additional observations needed to augment any initial "small" survey sample.
    Show full item record

    Files in this item

    Icon
    Name:
    vu00-w46.pdf
    Size:
    1.454Mb
    Format:
    PDF
    View/Open

    This item appears in the following collection(s):

    • Working Papers

    Connect with Vanderbilt Libraries

    Your Vanderbilt

    • Alumni
    • Current Students
    • Faculty & Staff
    • International Students
    • Media
    • Parents & Family
    • Prospective Students
    • Researchers
    • Sports Fans
    • Visitors & Neighbors

    Support the Jean and Alexander Heard Libraries

    Support the Library...Give Now

    Gifts to the Libraries support the learning and research needs of the entire Vanderbilt community. Learn more about giving to the Libraries.

    Become a Friend of the Libraries

    Quick Links

    • Hours
    • About
    • Employment
    • Staff Directory
    • Accessibility Services
    • Contact
    • Vanderbilt Home
    • Privacy Policy