Show simple item record

Multiple Literacies in Language Arts and Science & Potential for Integrated Instruction

dc.contributor.advisorLeona Schaubleen
dc.contributor.authorRumley, Mary
dc.date.accessioned2008-08-18T15:54:14Z
dc.date.available2008-08-18T15:54:14Z
dc.date.issued2008-08-18T15:54:14Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1803/1215
dc.descriptionTeaching and Learning Department Capstone projecten
dc.description.abstractThis comprehensive essay addresses the issue of literacy in language arts and in science as it relates to learners and learning, the learning environment, curriculum and instructional strategies, and assessment in the science and language arts content areas. My primary concern is investigating what it means to be literate in science and language arts, which I investigate first by identifying and exploring Adams's and Goodman & Goodman's models of language literacy development and various definitions of scientific literacy as described by The American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), the National Research Council's (NRC) Committee on Science Learning, Kindergarten through 8th Grade, and the Center for Science, Mathematics, and Engineering Education's Roger W. Bybee, and Matthew Weinstein. Specifically, my essay is guided by the focusing question, "how does science literacy differ from literacy in reading/writing class?" I address the question as it relates to my area of specialization, elementary education. In answering this question, this essay explains the cognitive processes involved in developing the respective literacies and provides solid, research-based recommendations for best practices for instruction and assessment. It extends to investigate how integrated instruction is used, and to what end, in developing literacy in both content areas. My final recommendation is that reading, writing, and inquiry be used together to bolster achievement across subject areas, to make learning meaningful for students, and to be used in developing and implementing more authentic assessment techniques that reflect how practitioners actually use the respective literacies.en
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.publisherVanderbilt University. Peabody College
dc.subjectScience literacyen
dc.subjectLanguage arts literacyen
dc.subject.lcshLiteracy -- Study and teachingen
dc.titleMultiple Literacies in Language Arts and Science & Potential for Integrated Instructionen
dc.typeCapstoneen
dc.description.collegePeabody College of Education and Human Developmenten
dc.description.departmentDepartment of Teaching and Learningen


Files in this item

Icon
Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record